Japan vs Japan — 1997 vs 1983
| Civic Type R EK9 | City Turbo II Bulldog | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 185 hp | 110 hp |
| Torque | 118 lb-ft | 118 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,595 cc | 1,231 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7 sec | 8.6 sec |
| Top Speed | 143 mph | 109 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 15.0 sec | 16.5 sec |
| Weight | 2,315 lbs | 1,620 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,620 mm | 2,220 mm |
| Length | 4,180 mm | 3,380 mm |
| Value (Excellent) | $80,000 | $40,000 |
| Collectibility | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Rarity | 7/10 | 8/10 |
On balance, the 1997 Honda Civic Type R EK9 makes a stronger case on paper with more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. However, the 1983 Honda City Turbo II Bulldog counters with lighter weight, better value, and its appeal extends beyond mere numbers. Choose the 1997 Honda Civic Type R EK9 for outright capability, or the 1983 Honda City Turbo II Bulldog for a more distinctive ownership experience.
Honda has long offered a diverse lineup, and comparing the 1997 Honda Civic Type R EK9 with the 1983 Honda City Turbo II Bulldog highlights the breadth of the marque's engineering philosophy. The 1997 Honda Civic Type R EK9 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 185 hp compared to 110 hp, a 75-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Honda Civic Type R uses a Inline-4 DOHC VTEC (B16B) displacing 1,595 cc, while the Honda City Turbo II relies on a Inline-4 SOHC Turbocharged Intercooled with 1,231 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1997 Honda Civic Type R EK9 edges ahead at 6.7 seconds versus 8.6 seconds. The Honda City Turbo II carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 695 lbs lighter. Each of these machines offers a unique window into the era that produced it, making both worthy of consideration by collectors and drivers alike.