USA vs Germany — 2004 vs 2000
| CTS-V Supercharged | M5 E39 | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 556 hp | 394 hp |
| Torque | 551 lb-ft | 369 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 6,162 cc | 4,941 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 3.9 sec | 4.8 sec |
| Top Speed | 191 mph | 155 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 12.0 sec | 13.1 sec |
| Weight | 4,250 lbs | 3,956 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,880 mm | 2,830 mm |
| Length | 4,867 mm | 4,783 mm |
| Units Produced | 30,000 | 20,482 |
| Original MSRP | $63,995 | $69,400 |
| Value (Excellent) | $75,000 | $70,000 |
| Collectibility | 7/10 | 8/10 |
| Rarity | 4/10 | 4/10 |
Two outstanding machines, each with compelling strengths. The 2004 Cadillac CTS-V Supercharged excels in more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed, while the 2000 BMW M5 E39 stands out for lighter weight, stronger collectibility. The best advice? Drive both if you can, then follow your instincts.
Putting the 2004 Cadillac CTS-V Supercharged against the 2000 BMW M5 E39 is a comparison that enthusiasts have debated for decades. Each car reflects distinct design philosophies shaped by different automotive cultures — USA versus Germany. The 2004 Cadillac CTS-V Supercharged holds a clear advantage in raw power with 556 hp compared to 394 hp, a 162-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Cadillac CTS-V uses a V8 OHV Supercharged (LSA) displacing 6,162 cc, while the BMW M5 relies on a V8 DOHC 32V (S62) with 4,941 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2004 Cadillac CTS-V Supercharged edges ahead at 3.9 seconds versus 4.8 seconds. The BMW M5 carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 294 lbs lighter. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.