Czechoslovakia vs Germany — 1946 vs 1958
| Minor II | 1000 1000S | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 20 hp | 55 hp |
| Torque | 29 lb-ft | 65 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 615 cc | 981 cc |
| 0-60 mph | — | 19.5 sec |
| Top Speed | 56 mph | 84 mph |
| ¼ Mile | — | 22.0 sec |
| Weight | 1,499 lbs | 1,918 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,350 mm | 2,440 mm |
| Length | 3,750 mm | 4,230 mm |
| Units Produced | — | 244,143 |
| Value (Excellent) | $25,000 | $18,000 |
| Collectibility | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Rarity | 8/10 | 6/10 |
The 1958 Auto Union 1000 1000S emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering more power, higher top speed, better value. The 1946 Aero Minor II counters with lighter weight, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.
Putting the 1946 Aero Minor II against the 1958 Auto Union 1000 1000S is a comparison that enthusiasts have debated for decades. Each car reflects distinct design philosophies shaped by different automotive cultures — Czechoslovakia versus Germany. The 1958 Auto Union 1000 1000S holds a clear advantage in raw power with 55 hp compared to 20 hp, a 35-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Aero Minor uses a Inline-2 OHV displacing 615 cc, while the Auto Union 1000 relies on a Inline-3 2-stroke with 981 cc. The 1958 Auto Union 1000 1000S claims a higher top speed at 84 mph compared to 56 mph. The Aero Minor carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 419 lbs lighter. Whether you prioritize driving dynamics, heritage, or aesthetic appeal, both contenders make a strong case for themselves.