Ford Mustang

vs

Dodge Challenger

USA vs USA β€” 1964 vs 1970

Ford Mustang (1964)
Dodge Challenger (1970)
Specifications
Mustang K-Code Hi-PerformanceChallenger T/A 340 Six Pack
Horsepower271 hp290 hp
Torque314 lb-ft340 lb-ft
Engine Size4,736 cc5,572 cc
0-60 mph6.5 sec5.8 sec
Top Speed130 mph130 mph
ΒΌ Mile14.8 sec14.0 sec
Weight2,678 lbs3,400 lbs
Wheelbase2,743 mm2,794 mm
Length4,613 mm4,871 mm
Units Produced7,2732,399
Original MSRP$2,911$3,590
Value (Excellent)$150,000$250,000
Collectibility9/109/10
Rarity8/109/10
The Verdict

This matchup is remarkably close. The 1964 Ford Mustang K-Code Hi-Performance offers lighter weight, better value, while the 1970 Dodge Challenger T/A 340 Six Pack counters with quicker acceleration, greater rarity. Neither holds a decisive advantage, making this a true enthusiast's dilemma. Your choice ultimately depends on which driving philosophy resonates more with you.

Overview

The 1964 Ford Mustang K-Code Hi-Performance and 1970 Dodge Challenger T/A 340 Six Pack stand as two of the most notable Pony Car cars from Muscle era. Both emerged during a period of intense competition, and choosing between them remains a passionate debate among collectors. On paper, the two are remarkably close in power output, with the 1964 Ford Mustang K-Code Hi-Performance producing 271 hp and the 1970 Dodge Challenger T/A 340 Six Pack delivering 290 hp. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Ford Mustang uses a V8 OHV (solid lifter, high-performance) displacing 4,736 cc, while the Dodge Challenger relies on a V8 OHV with 5,572 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1970 Dodge Challenger T/A 340 Six Pack edges ahead at 5.8 seconds versus 6.5 seconds. The Ford Mustang carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 722 lbs lighter. Both cars have earned their place in automotive history and continue to captivate enthusiasts around the world.