Croatia vs China — 2013 vs 2016
| Concept One Standard | EP9 Standard | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 1,224 hp | 1,341 hp |
| Torque | 1,180 lb-ft | 1,092 lb-ft |
| 0-60 mph | 2.6 sec | 2.7 sec |
| Top Speed | 221 mph | 194 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 9.9 sec | 10.1 sec |
| Weight | 4,078 lbs | 3,825 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,750 mm | 2,670 mm |
| Length | 4,480 mm | 4,888 mm |
| Units Produced | 8 | 16 |
| Original MSRP | $980,000 | $1,480,000 |
| Value (Excellent) | $3,000,000 | $4,500,000 |
| Collectibility | 10/10 | 9/10 |
| Rarity | 10/10 | 10/10 |
The 2013 Rimac Concept One Standard holds an edge across most measurable criteria, offering quicker acceleration, higher top speed, stronger collectibility. That said, the 2016 NIO EP9 Standard brings lighter weight and remains a compelling choice for enthusiasts who value NIO heritage. The right pick depends on whether you prioritize specifications or the intangible qualities that make a car truly special.
Putting the 2013 Rimac Concept One Standard against the 2016 NIO EP9 Standard is a comparison that enthusiasts have debated for decades. Each car reflects distinct design philosophies shaped by different automotive cultures — Croatia versus China. The 2016 NIO EP9 Standard holds a clear advantage in raw power with 1341 hp compared to 1224 hp, a 117-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. The engine configurations differ significantly — a 4x Permanent Magnet Synchronous Electric Motors in the Rimac Concept One versus a Quad Electric Motor in the NIO EP9. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2013 Rimac Concept One Standard edges ahead at 2.6 seconds versus 2.7 seconds. The NIO EP9 carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 253 lbs lighter. Whether you prioritize driving dynamics, heritage, or aesthetic appeal, both contenders make a strong case for themselves.