Japan vs Japan — 1996 vs 1992
| Lancer Evolution Evo VI TME | Lancer Evolution Evolution I CD9A | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 280 hp | 247 hp |
| Torque | 275 lb-ft | 228 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,997 cc | 1,997 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4 sec | 5.3 sec |
| Top Speed | 155 mph | 143 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 13.1 sec | 13.9 sec |
| Weight | 2,998 lbs | 2,579 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,510 mm | 2,500 mm |
| Length | 4,350 mm | 4,310 mm |
| Units Produced | — | 5,000 |
| Value (Excellent) | $100,000 | $120,000 |
| Collectibility | 8/10 | 9/10 |
| Rarity | 7/10 | 9/10 |
It's a closely fought contest. The 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evo VI TME brings more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed to the table, and the 1992 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution I CD9A answers with lighter weight, stronger collectibility. Both are excellent machines that reward their owners in different ways — there's no wrong answer here.
Few model names carry as much weight as the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution. The 1996 and 1992 iterations represent different chapters in this storied nameplate's history, each reflecting the priorities and technologies of its era. The 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evo VI TME holds a clear advantage in raw power with 280 hp compared to 247 hp, a 33-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution uses a Inline-4 Turbo 4G63T displacing 1,997 cc, while the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution relies on a Inline-4 DOHC 16-valve turbo (4G63T) with 1,997 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evo VI TME edges ahead at 4.4 seconds versus 5.3 seconds. The Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 419 lbs lighter. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.