Mazda Cosmo Sport

vs

Porsche 911

Japan vs Germany — 1967 vs 1973

Mazda Cosmo Sport (1967)
Porsche 911 (1973)
Specifications
Cosmo Sport 110S (L10B)911 Carrera RS 2.7 (F-series)
Horsepower128 hp210 hp
Torque96 lb-ft188 lb-ft
Engine Size982 cc2,687 cc
0-60 mph8.7 sec5.5 sec
Top Speed115 mph152 mph
¼ Mile16.0 sec14.0 sec
Wheelbase2,200 mm2,271 mm
Length4,140 mm4,163 mm
Units Produced1,1761,580
Value (Excellent)$150,000$1,600,000
Collectibility5/105/10
Rarity10/108/10
The Verdict

The 1973 Porsche 911 Carrera RS 2.7 (F-series) emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The 1967 Mazda Cosmo Sport 110S (L10B) counters with better value, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.

Overview

Putting the 1967 Mazda Cosmo Sport 110S (L10B) against the 1973 Porsche 911 Carrera RS 2.7 (F-series) is a comparison that enthusiasts have debated for decades. Each car reflects distinct design philosophies shaped by different automotive cultures — Japan versus Germany. The 1973 Porsche 911 Carrera RS 2.7 (F-series) holds a clear advantage in raw power with 210 hp compared to 128 hp, a 82-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Mazda Cosmo Sport uses a Twin-Rotor Wankel displacing 982 cc, while the Porsche 911 relies on a Flat-6 Air-Cooled with 2,687 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1973 Porsche 911 Carrera RS 2.7 (F-series) edges ahead at 5.5 seconds versus 8.7 seconds. On the collector market, the 1973 Porsche 911 Carrera RS 2.7 (F-series) commands a significant premium over the 1967 Mazda Cosmo Sport 110S (L10B), reflecting differences in prestige and rarity.