Germany vs Germany — 1980 vs 2003
| Quattro Ur-Quattro (20V Turbo) | RS6 C5 Avant | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 220 hp | 450 hp |
| Torque | 228 lb-ft | 413 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 2,226 cc | 4,172 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 5.9 sec | 4.4 sec |
| Top Speed | 143 mph | 155 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 14.3 sec | 12.9 sec |
| Weight | 2,976 lbs | 4,266 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,524 mm | 2,760 mm |
| Length | 4,404 mm | 4,843 mm |
| Units Produced | 11,452 | 4,315 |
| Original MSRP | $35,950 | $84,900 |
| Value (Excellent) | $150,000 | $65,000 |
| Collectibility | 8/10 | 8/10 |
| Rarity | 7/10 | 7/10 |
The 2003 Audi RS6 C5 Avant emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The 1980 Audi Quattro Ur-Quattro (20V Turbo) counters with lighter weight, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.
Within the Audi stable, the 1980 Audi Quattro Ur-Quattro (20V Turbo) and 2003 Audi RS6 C5 Avant represent different approaches to performance and purpose. Both carry the Audi badge, yet each carves out its own distinct identity. The 2003 Audi RS6 C5 Avant holds a clear advantage in raw power with 450 hp compared to 220 hp, a 230-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Audi Quattro uses a Inline-5 Turbo 20V (RR) displacing 2,226 cc, while the Audi RS6 relies on a V8 DOHC 32V Twin-Turbo with 4,172 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2003 Audi RS6 C5 Avant edges ahead at 4.4 seconds versus 5.9 seconds. The Audi Quattro carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 1290 lbs lighter. On the collector market, the 1980 Audi Quattro Ur-Quattro (20V Turbo) commands a significant premium over the 2003 Audi RS6 C5 Avant, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity.