France vs France — 1994 vs 1989
| Clio Williams | 21 Turbo Quadra | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 150 hp | 175 hp |
| Torque | 129 lb-ft | 203 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,998 cc | 1,995 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5 sec | 7.0 sec |
| Top Speed | 134 mph | 146 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 15.5 sec | 15.2 sec |
| Weight | — | 2,888 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,472 mm | 2,656 mm |
| Length | 3,710 mm | 4,497 mm |
| Units Produced | 12,100 | — |
| Value (Excellent) | $45,000 | $25,000 |
| Collectibility | 5/10 | 6/10 |
| Rarity | 7/10 | 7/10 |
The 1989 Renault 21 Turbo Quadra emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The 1994 Renault Clio Williams counters with its unique character, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.
The 1994 Renault Clio Williams and 1989 Renault 21 Turbo Quadra share a manufacturer in Renault, but that's where the similarities get interesting. These two models reveal the versatility and ambition of the Renault brand. The 1989 Renault 21 Turbo Quadra holds a clear advantage in raw power with 175 hp compared to 150 hp, a 25-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Renault Clio Williams uses a Inline-4 DOHC 16V displacing 1,998 cc, while the Renault 21 relies on a Inline-4 SOHC Turbo with 1,995 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1989 Renault 21 Turbo Quadra edges ahead at 7.0 seconds versus 7.5 seconds. On the collector market, the 1994 Renault Clio Williams commands a significant premium over the 1989 Renault 21 Turbo Quadra, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity.