USA vs USA — 1967 vs 2010
| Camaro SS 350 | Camaro ZL1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 295 hp | 580 hp |
| Torque | 360 lb-ft | 556 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 5,736 cc | 6,162 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0 sec | 3.9 sec |
| Top Speed | 125 mph | 184 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 15.0 sec | 12.0 sec |
| Weight | 3,250 lbs | 4,120 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,743 mm | 2,852 mm |
| Length | 4,724 mm | 4,836 mm |
| Units Produced | 220,906 | — |
| Original MSRP | $2,572 | $55,305 |
| Value (Excellent) | $80,000 | $55,000 |
| Collectibility | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Rarity | 3/10 | 5/10 |
This matchup is remarkably close. The 1967 Chevrolet Camaro SS 350 offers lighter weight, stronger collectibility, while the 2010 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 counters with more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. Neither holds a decisive advantage, making this a true enthusiast's dilemma. Your choice ultimately depends on which driving philosophy resonates more with you.
The Chevrolet Camaro lineage tells a fascinating story of automotive evolution. Comparing the 1967 Chevrolet Camaro SS 350 with the 2010 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 reveals how Chevrolet refined and reimagined one of its most important nameplates over the years. The 2010 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 580 hp compared to 295 hp, a 285-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Chevrolet Camaro uses a V8 OHV (small-block) displacing 5,736 cc, while the Chevrolet Camaro relies on a V8 OHV Supercharged (LSA) with 6,162 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2010 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 edges ahead at 3.9 seconds versus 7.0 seconds. The Chevrolet Camaro carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 870 lbs lighter. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.