Studebaker Lark

vs

Studebaker Golden Hawk

USA vs USA β€” 1962 vs 1956

Studebaker Lark (1962)
Studebaker Golden Hawk (1956)
Specifications
Lark Daytona ConvertibleGolden Hawk Supercharged
Horsepower225 hp275 hp
Torque280 lb-ft330 lb-ft
Engine Size4,736 cc4,736 cc
0-60 mph9.5 sec8.0 sec
Top Speed115 mph125 mph
ΒΌ Mile17.0 sec16.0 sec
Weight3,049 lbs3,600 lbs
Wheelbase2,794 mm3,048 mm
Length4,775 mm5,156 mm
Units Produced3,6024,356
Original MSRP$2,814$3,095
Value (Excellent)$45,000$65,000
Collectibility6/108/10
Rarity7/107/10
The Verdict

The 1956 Studebaker Golden Hawk Supercharged emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The 1962 Studebaker Lark Daytona Convertible counters with lighter weight, better value, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.

Overview

Within the Studebaker stable, the 1962 Studebaker Lark Daytona Convertible and 1956 Studebaker Golden Hawk Supercharged represent different approaches to performance and purpose. Both carry the Studebaker badge, yet each carves out its own distinct identity. The 1956 Studebaker Golden Hawk Supercharged holds a clear advantage in raw power with 275 hp compared to 225 hp, a 50-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Studebaker Lark uses a V8 OHV displacing 4,736 cc, while the Studebaker Golden Hawk relies on a V8 OHV (Packard 289 Supercharged) with 4,736 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1956 Studebaker Golden Hawk Supercharged edges ahead at 8.0 seconds versus 9.5 seconds. The Studebaker Lark carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 551 lbs lighter. From a collectibility standpoint, the 1956 Studebaker Golden Hawk Supercharged rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.