Holden Commodore VE

vs

Holden LJ Torana GTR XU-1

Australia vs Australia — 2006 vs 1972

Holden Commodore VE (2006)
Holden LJ Torana GTR XU-1 (1972)
Specifications
Commodore VE HSV GTSR W1LJ Torana GTR XU-1 Bathurst
Horsepower636 hp186 hp
Torque601 lb-ft207 lb-ft
Engine Size6,162 cc3,310 cc
0-60 mph3.9 sec8.0 sec
Top Speed193 mph124 mph
¼ Mile12.0 sec15.8 sec
Weight4,081 lbs2,348 lbs
Wheelbase2,915 mm2,540 mm
Length4,932 mm4,330 mm
Units Produced275
Value (Excellent)$500,000$350,000
Collectibility10/109/10
Rarity9/108/10
The Verdict

On balance, the 2006 Holden Commodore VE HSV GTSR W1 makes a stronger case on paper with more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. However, the 1972 Holden LJ Torana GTR XU-1 Bathurst counters with lighter weight, better value, and its appeal extends beyond mere numbers. Choose the 2006 Holden Commodore VE HSV GTSR W1 for outright capability, or the 1972 Holden LJ Torana GTR XU-1 Bathurst for a more distinctive ownership experience.

Overview

Holden has long offered a diverse lineup, and comparing the 2006 Holden Commodore VE HSV GTSR W1 with the 1972 Holden LJ Torana GTR XU-1 Bathurst highlights the breadth of the marque's engineering philosophy. The 2006 Holden Commodore VE HSV GTSR W1 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 636 hp compared to 186 hp, a 450-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Holden Commodore VE uses a V8 Supercharged OHV LS9 displacing 6,162 cc, while the Holden LJ Torana GTR XU-1 relies on a Inline-6 OHV with 3,310 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2006 Holden Commodore VE HSV GTSR W1 edges ahead at 3.9 seconds versus 8.0 seconds. The Holden LJ Torana GTR XU-1 carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 1733 lbs lighter. On the collector market, the 2006 Holden Commodore VE HSV GTSR W1 commands a significant premium over the 1972 Holden LJ Torana GTR XU-1 Bathurst, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity.