UK vs Japan — 1961 vs 1970
| TR4 IRS | Celica TA22 GT | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 104 hp | 115 hp |
| Torque | 128 lb-ft | 105 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 2,138 cc | 1,588 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 10.9 sec | 9.8 sec |
| Top Speed | 109 mph | 118 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 17.9 sec | 17.2 sec |
| Weight | 2,249 lbs | 2,105 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,235 mm | 2,425 mm |
| Length | 3,962 mm | 4,165 mm |
| Units Produced | 28,465 | — |
| Original MSRP | $2,800 | $2,798 |
| Value (Excellent) | $50,000 | $65,000 |
| Collectibility | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Rarity | 4/10 | 6/10 |
The 1970 Toyota Celica TA22 GT emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The 1961 Triumph TR4 IRS counters with its unique character, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.
Putting the 1961 Triumph TR4 IRS against the 1970 Toyota Celica TA22 GT is a comparison that enthusiasts have debated for decades. Each car reflects distinct design philosophies shaped by different automotive cultures — UK versus Japan. On paper, the two are remarkably close in power output, with the 1961 Triumph TR4 IRS producing 104 hp and the 1970 Toyota Celica TA22 GT delivering 115 hp. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Triumph TR4 uses a Inline-4 OHV displacing 2,138 cc, while the Toyota Celica relies on a Inline-4 DOHC with 1,588 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1970 Toyota Celica TA22 GT edges ahead at 9.8 seconds versus 10.9 seconds. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.