USA vs Australia — 1967 vs 1968
| Camaro Z/28 | Falcon GT-HO Phase III | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 290 hp | 300 hp |
| Torque | 290 lb-ft | 360 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 4,948 cc | 5,763 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8 sec | 6.4 sec |
| Top Speed | 130 mph | 145 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 14.2 sec | 14.4 sec |
| Wheelbase | 2,743 mm | 2,819 mm |
| Length | 4,724 mm | 4,908 mm |
| Units Produced | 602 | 300 |
| Value (Excellent) | $450,000 | $1,500,000 |
| Collectibility | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Rarity | 7/10 | 10/10 |
This matchup is remarkably close. The 1967 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28 offers quicker acceleration, better value, while the 1968 Ford Falcon GT-HO Phase III counters with higher top speed, greater rarity. Neither holds a decisive advantage, making this a true enthusiast's dilemma. Your choice ultimately depends on which driving philosophy resonates more with you.
When USA engineering meets Australia craftsmanship, the result is one of the most compelling matchups in the classic car world. The 1967 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28 and 1968 Ford Falcon GT-HO Phase III embody their respective national automotive traditions while competing in the same arena. On paper, the two are remarkably close in power output, with the 1967 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28 producing 290 hp and the 1968 Ford Falcon GT-HO Phase III delivering 300 hp. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1967 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28 edges ahead at 5.8 seconds versus 6.4 seconds. On the collector market, the 1968 Ford Falcon GT-HO Phase III commands a significant premium over the 1967 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity.