UK vs UK — 1929 vs 1925
| Phantom II Continental | Phantom III V12 | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 120 hp | 165 hp |
| Torque | — | 350 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 7,668 cc | 7,340 cc |
| Top Speed | 92 mph | 92 mph |
| Weight | 4,850 lbs | 5,732 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 3,658 mm | 3,810 mm |
| Length | 5,000 mm | 5,740 mm |
| Units Produced | 278 | 727 |
| Original MSRP | — | $15,000 |
| Value (Excellent) | $3,000,000 | $1,500,000 |
| Collectibility | 10/10 | 9/10 |
| Rarity | 9/10 | 8/10 |
This matchup is remarkably close. The 1929 Rolls-Royce Phantom II Continental offers lighter weight, greater rarity, stronger collectibility, while the 1925 Rolls-Royce Phantom III V12 counters with more power, better value. Neither holds a decisive advantage, making this a true enthusiast's dilemma. Your choice ultimately depends on which driving philosophy resonates more with you.
The Rolls-Royce Phantom II Continental lineage tells a fascinating story of automotive evolution. Comparing the 1929 Rolls-Royce Phantom II Continental with the 1925 Rolls-Royce Phantom III V12 reveals how Rolls-Royce refined and reimagined one of its most important nameplates over the years. The 1925 Rolls-Royce Phantom III V12 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 165 hp compared to 120 hp, a 45-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Rolls-Royce Phantom II Continental uses a Inline-6 OHV displacing 7,668 cc, while the Rolls-Royce Phantom III relies on a V12 OHV with 7,340 cc. The 1925 Rolls-Royce Phantom III V12 claims a higher top speed at 92 mph compared to 92 mph. The Rolls-Royce Phantom II Continental carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 882 lbs lighter. On the collector market, the 1929 Rolls-Royce Phantom II Continental commands a significant premium over the 1925 Rolls-Royce Phantom III V12, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity.