Japan vs Japan — 2004 vs 1996
| Lancer Evolution IX MR | Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 286 hp | 280 hp |
| Torque | 295 lb-ft | 260 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,997 cc | 1,997 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5 sec | 4.7 sec |
| Top Speed | 150 mph | 152 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 13.1 sec | 13.3 sec |
| Weight | — | 2,778 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,625 mm | 2,510 mm |
| Length | 4,490 mm | 4,330 mm |
| Value (Excellent) | $80,000 | $85,000 |
| Collectibility | 5/10 | 8/10 |
| Rarity | 6/10 | 8/10 |
It's a closely fought contest. The 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IX MR brings quicker acceleration to the table, and the 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A answers with higher top speed, stronger collectibility. Both are excellent machines that reward their owners in different ways — there's no wrong answer here.
Few model names carry as much weight as the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution. The 2004 and 1996 iterations represent different chapters in this storied nameplate's history, each reflecting the priorities and technologies of its era. On paper, the two are remarkably close in power output, with the 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IX MR producing 286 hp and the 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A delivering 280 hp. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution uses a Inline-4 Turbo DOHC 16V MIVEC displacing 1,997 cc, while the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution relies on a Inline-4 DOHC 16-valve turbo (4G63T) with 1,997 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IX MR edges ahead at 4.5 seconds versus 4.7 seconds. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference. From a collectibility standpoint, the 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.