Germany vs Germany — 2000 vs 2008
| M5 E39 | M3 E92 | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 394 hp | 414 hp |
| Torque | 369 lb-ft | 295 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 4,941 cc | 3,999 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 4.8 sec | 4.1 sec |
| Top Speed | 155 mph | 155 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 13.1 sec | 12.4 sec |
| Weight | 3,956 lbs | 3,483 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,830 mm | 2,761 mm |
| Length | 4,783 mm | 4,615 mm |
| Units Produced | 20,482 | 40,000 |
| Original MSRP | $69,400 | $58,400 |
| Value (Excellent) | $70,000 | $70,000 |
| Collectibility | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Rarity | 4/10 | 4/10 |
This matchup is remarkably close. The 2000 BMW M5 E39 offers stronger collectibility, while the 2008 BMW M3 E92 counters with quicker acceleration, lighter weight. Neither holds a decisive advantage, making this a true enthusiast's dilemma. Your choice ultimately depends on which driving philosophy resonates more with you.
Within the BMW stable, the 2000 BMW M5 E39 and 2008 BMW M3 E92 represent different approaches to performance and purpose. Both carry the BMW badge, yet each carves out its own distinct identity. The 2008 BMW M3 E92 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 414 hp compared to 394 hp, a 20-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the BMW M5 uses a V8 DOHC 32V (S62) displacing 4,941 cc, while the BMW M3 relies on a V8 DOHC 32V with 3,999 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2008 BMW M3 E92 edges ahead at 4.1 seconds versus 4.8 seconds. The BMW M3 carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 473 lbs lighter. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.