France vs France — 1982 vs 1974
| BX GTI 16V | CX GTi Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 160 hp | 168 hp |
| Torque | 134 lb-ft | 203 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,905 cc | 2,500 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 7.6 sec | 7.9 sec |
| Top Speed | 137 mph | 137 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 15.8 sec | 16.0 sec |
| Weight | 2,293 lbs | 3,042 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,655 mm | 2,900 mm |
| Length | 4,230 mm | 4,770 mm |
| Value (Excellent) | $22,000 | $45,000 |
| Collectibility | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Rarity | 7/10 | 7/10 |
The 1982 Citroen BX GTI 16V holds an edge across most measurable criteria, offering quicker acceleration, lighter weight, better value. That said, the 1974 Citroen CX GTi Turbo brings stronger collectibility and remains a compelling choice for enthusiasts who value Citroen heritage. The right pick depends on whether you prioritize specifications or the intangible qualities that make a car truly special.
The 1982 Citroen BX GTI 16V and 1974 Citroen CX GTi Turbo share a manufacturer in Citroen, but that's where the similarities get interesting. These two models reveal the versatility and ambition of the Citroen brand. On paper, the two are remarkably close in power output, with the 1982 Citroen BX GTI 16V producing 160 hp and the 1974 Citroen CX GTi Turbo delivering 168 hp. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Citroen BX uses a Inline-4 DOHC 16V displacing 1,905 cc, while the Citroen CX relies on a Inline-4 SOHC Turbo with 2,500 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1982 Citroen BX GTI 16V edges ahead at 7.6 seconds versus 7.9 seconds. The Citroen BX carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 749 lbs lighter. Whether you prioritize driving dynamics, heritage, or aesthetic appeal, both contenders make a strong case for themselves.