Japan vs Japan — 1996 vs 1996
| Lancer Evolution Evo VI TME | Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 280 hp | 280 hp |
| Torque | 275 lb-ft | 260 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,997 cc | 1,997 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4 sec | 4.7 sec |
| Top Speed | 155 mph | 152 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 13.1 sec | 13.3 sec |
| Weight | 2,998 lbs | 2,778 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,510 mm | 2,510 mm |
| Length | 4,350 mm | 4,330 mm |
| Value (Excellent) | $100,000 | $85,000 |
| Collectibility | 8/10 | 8/10 |
| Rarity | 7/10 | 8/10 |
This matchup is remarkably close. The 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evo VI TME offers quicker acceleration, higher top speed, while the 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A counters with lighter weight. Neither holds a decisive advantage, making this a true enthusiast's dilemma. Your choice ultimately depends on which driving philosophy resonates more with you.
The Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution lineage tells a fascinating story of automotive evolution. Comparing the 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evo VI TME with the 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A reveals how Mitsubishi refined and reimagined one of its most important nameplates over the years. On paper, the two are remarkably close in power output, with the 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evo VI TME producing 280 hp and the 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A delivering 280 hp. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution uses a Inline-4 Turbo 4G63T displacing 1,997 cc, while the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution relies on a Inline-4 DOHC 16-valve turbo (4G63T) with 1,997 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evo VI TME edges ahead at 4.4 seconds versus 4.7 seconds. The Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 220 lbs lighter. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.