USA vs USA — 1970 vs 1962
| AAR 'Cuda 340 Six Pack | Savoy 426 Max Wedge | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 290 hp | 425 hp |
| Torque | 340 lb-ft | 480 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 5,572 cc | 6,981 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8 sec | 5.5 sec |
| Top Speed | 125 mph | 130 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 14.0 sec | 12.5 sec |
| Weight | 3,400 lbs | 3,300 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,743 mm | 2,946 mm |
| Length | 4,871 mm | 5,080 mm |
| Units Produced | 2,724 | — |
| Original MSRP | $3,563 | $3,500 |
| Value (Excellent) | $180,000 | $250,000 |
| Collectibility | 9/10 | 10/10 |
| Rarity | 9/10 | 10/10 |
The 1962 Plymouth Savoy 426 Max Wedge emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The 1970 Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340 Six Pack counters with its unique character, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.
The 1970 Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340 Six Pack and 1962 Plymouth Savoy 426 Max Wedge share a manufacturer in Plymouth, but that's where the similarities get interesting. These two models reveal the versatility and ambition of the Plymouth brand. The 1962 Plymouth Savoy 426 Max Wedge holds a clear advantage in raw power with 425 hp compared to 290 hp, a 135-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Plymouth AAR 'Cuda uses a V8 OHV (340 Six Pack) displacing 5,572 cc, while the Plymouth Savoy relies on a V8 OHV with 6,981 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1962 Plymouth Savoy 426 Max Wedge edges ahead at 5.5 seconds versus 5.8 seconds. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.