Japan vs Japan — 1983 vs 2020
| City Turbo II Bulldog | e Advance | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 110 hp | 152 hp |
| Torque | 118 lb-ft | 232 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,231 cc | — |
| 0-60 mph | 8.6 sec | 8.3 sec |
| Top Speed | 109 mph | 90 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 16.5 sec | 16.5 sec |
| Weight | 1,620 lbs | 3,401 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,220 mm | 2,530 mm |
| Length | 3,380 mm | 3,895 mm |
| Value (Excellent) | $40,000 | $40,000 |
| Collectibility | 7/10 | 5/10 |
| Rarity | 8/10 | 6/10 |
The 1983 Honda City Turbo II Bulldog holds an edge across most measurable criteria, offering higher top speed, lighter weight, stronger collectibility. That said, the 2020 Honda e Advance brings more power, quicker acceleration and remains a compelling choice for enthusiasts who value Honda heritage. The right pick depends on whether you prioritize specifications or the intangible qualities that make a car truly special.
The 1983 Honda City Turbo II Bulldog and 2020 Honda e Advance share a manufacturer in Honda, but that's where the similarities get interesting. These two models reveal the versatility and ambition of the Honda brand. The 2020 Honda e Advance holds a clear advantage in raw power with 152 hp compared to 110 hp, a 42-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. The engine configurations differ significantly — a Inline-4 SOHC Turbocharged Intercooled in the Honda City Turbo II versus a Electric Motor (Rear-mounted) in the Honda e. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2020 Honda e Advance edges ahead at 8.3 seconds versus 8.6 seconds. The Honda City Turbo II carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 1781 lbs lighter. From a collectibility standpoint, the 1983 Honda City Turbo II Bulldog rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.