Japan vs Japan — 1989 vs 1997
| MR2 Turbo (SW20) | Century V12 (GZG50) | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 245 hp | 280 hp |
| Torque | 224 lb-ft | 339 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,998 cc | 4,996 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 5.9 sec | 7.5 sec |
| Top Speed | 152 mph | 130 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 14.2 sec | 15.5 sec |
| Weight | — | 4,630 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,400 mm | 3,025 mm |
| Length | 4,170 mm | 5,270 mm |
| Value (Excellent) | $50,000 | $80,000 |
| Collectibility | 5/10 | 8/10 |
| Rarity | 6/10 | 8/10 |
This matchup is remarkably close. The 1989 Toyota MR2 Turbo (SW20) offers quicker acceleration, higher top speed, while the 1997 Toyota Century V12 (GZG50) counters with more power, stronger collectibility. Neither holds a decisive advantage, making this a true enthusiast's dilemma. Your choice ultimately depends on which driving philosophy resonates more with you.
Within the Toyota stable, the 1989 Toyota MR2 Turbo (SW20) and 1997 Toyota Century V12 (GZG50) represent different approaches to performance and purpose. Both carry the Toyota badge, yet each carves out its own distinct identity. The 1997 Toyota Century V12 (GZG50) holds a clear advantage in raw power with 280 hp compared to 245 hp, a 35-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Toyota MR2 uses a Inline-4 DOHC 16V Turbo displacing 1,998 cc, while the Toyota Century relies on a V12 DOHC with 4,996 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1989 Toyota MR2 Turbo (SW20) edges ahead at 5.9 seconds versus 7.5 seconds. From a collectibility standpoint, the 1997 Toyota Century V12 (GZG50) rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.