France vs France — 1992 vs 2003
| Clio Williams | Clio V6 Phase 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 150 hp | 255 hp |
| Torque | 129 lb-ft | — |
| Engine Size | 1,998 cc | 2,946 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2 sec | — |
| Top Speed | 134 mph | — |
| ¼ Mile | 15.5 sec | — |
| Wheelbase | 2,472 mm | 2,467 mm |
| Length | 3,710 mm | 3,816 mm |
| Units Produced | 12,100 | 1,309 |
| Value (Excellent) | $55,000 | $120,000 |
| Collectibility | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Rarity | 6/10 | 10/10 |
Two outstanding machines, each with compelling strengths. The 1992 Renault Clio Williams excels in better value, while the 2003 Renault Clio V6 Phase 2 stands out for more power, greater rarity. The best advice? Drive both if you can, then follow your instincts.
Tracing the evolution of the Renault Clio from 1992 to 2003 offers a compelling look at how automotive design and engineering progressed. These two variants showcase the changing face of Renault. The 2003 Renault Clio V6 Phase 2 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 255 hp compared to 150 hp, a 105-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Renault Clio uses a Inline-4 DOHC 16V displacing 1,998 cc, while the Renault Clio relies on a V6 with 2,946 cc. Rarity plays a significant role here — with only 1,309 units built, the 2003 Renault Clio V6 Phase 2 is considerably scarcer than the Renault Clio's 12,100 examples. On the collector market, the 2003 Renault Clio V6 Phase 2 commands a significant premium over the 1992 Renault Clio Williams, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity.