AMC SC/Rambler

vs

Ford Shelby GT350H

USA vs USA β€” 1969 vs 1966

AMC SC/Rambler (1969)
Ford Shelby GT350H (1966)
Specifications
SC/Rambler Hurst 390Shelby GT350H Hertz Rent-A-Racer
Horsepower315 hp306 hp
Torque425 lb-ft329 lb-ft
Engine Size6,391 cc4,736 cc
0-60 mph6.3 sec6.6 sec
Top Speed120 mph130 mph
ΒΌ Mile14.2 sec14.9 sec
Weight3,200 lbs2,850 lbs
Wheelbase2,743 mm2,743 mm
Length4,699 mm4,613 mm
Units Produced1,5121,001
Original MSRP$2,998$4,547
Value (Excellent)$130,000$450,000
Collectibility9/1010/10
Rarity9/109/10
The Verdict

Two outstanding machines, each with compelling strengths. The 1969 AMC SC/Rambler Hurst 390 excels in quicker acceleration, better value, while the 1966 Ford Shelby GT350H Hertz Rent-A-Racer stands out for higher top speed, lighter weight, stronger collectibility. The best advice? Drive both if you can, then follow your instincts.

Overview

Among Muscle Car enthusiasts, the matchup between the 1969 AMC SC/Rambler Hurst 390 and 1966 Ford Shelby GT350H Hertz Rent-A-Racer is one for the ages. These Muscle era machines competed directly for buyers' attention and continue to vie for collectors' affections today. On paper, the two are remarkably close in power output, with the 1969 AMC SC/Rambler Hurst 390 producing 315 hp and the 1966 Ford Shelby GT350H Hertz Rent-A-Racer delivering 306 hp. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the AMC SC/Rambler uses a V8 OHV 16V displacing 6,391 cc, while the Ford Shelby GT350H relies on a V8 OHV with 4,736 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1969 AMC SC/Rambler Hurst 390 edges ahead at 6.3 seconds versus 6.6 seconds. The Ford Shelby GT350H carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 350 lbs lighter. On the collector market, the 1966 Ford Shelby GT350H Hertz Rent-A-Racer commands a significant premium over the 1969 AMC SC/Rambler Hurst 390, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity.