USA vs USA — 1970 vs 1962
| Gremlin X Package | Lark Daytona Convertible | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 100 hp | 225 hp |
| Torque | 180 lb-ft | 280 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 3,802 cc | 4,736 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 14.0 sec | 9.5 sec |
| Top Speed | 95 mph | 115 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 19.5 sec | 17.0 sec |
| Weight | — | 3,049 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,438 mm | 2,794 mm |
| Length | 4,199 mm | 4,775 mm |
| Units Produced | — | 3,602 |
| Original MSRP | — | $2,814 |
| Value (Excellent) | $22,000 | $45,000 |
| Collectibility | 5/10 | 6/10 |
| Rarity | 4/10 | 7/10 |
The 1962 Studebaker Lark Daytona Convertible emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The 1970 AMC Gremlin X Package counters with better value, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.
Among Compact enthusiasts, the matchup between the 1970 AMC Gremlin X Package and 1962 Studebaker Lark Daytona Convertible is one for the ages. These Muscle era machines competed directly for buyers' attention and continue to vie for collectors' affections today. The 1962 Studebaker Lark Daytona Convertible holds a clear advantage in raw power with 225 hp compared to 100 hp, a 125-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the AMC Gremlin uses a Inline-6 OHV displacing 3,802 cc, while the Studebaker Lark relies on a V8 OHV with 4,736 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1962 Studebaker Lark Daytona Convertible edges ahead at 9.5 seconds versus 14.0 seconds. Whether you prioritize driving dynamics, heritage, or aesthetic appeal, both contenders make a strong case for themselves.