France vs France — 2003 vs 2006
| Clio V6 Phase 2 | Clio RS 200 Cup | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 255 hp | 200 hp |
| Torque | — | 159 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 2,946 cc | 1,998 cc |
| 0-60 mph | — | 6.9 sec |
| Top Speed | — | 141 mph |
| ¼ Mile | — | 15.0 sec |
| Weight | — | 2,654 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,467 mm | 2,585 mm |
| Length | 3,816 mm | 3,990 mm |
| Units Produced | 1,309 | — |
| Value (Excellent) | $120,000 | $25,000 |
| Collectibility | 5/10 | 6/10 |
| Rarity | 10/10 | 5/10 |
Two outstanding machines, each with compelling strengths. The 2003 Renault Clio V6 Phase 2 excels in more power, while the 2006 Renault Clio RS 200 Cup stands out for stronger collectibility, better value. The best advice? Drive both if you can, then follow your instincts.
Tracing the evolution of the Renault Clio from 2003 to 2006 offers a compelling look at how automotive design and engineering progressed. These two variants showcase the changing face of Renault. The 2003 Renault Clio V6 Phase 2 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 255 hp compared to 200 hp, a 55-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Renault Clio uses a V6 displacing 2,946 cc, while the Renault Clio RS relies on a Inline-4 DOHC 16V with 1,998 cc. On the collector market, the 2003 Renault Clio V6 Phase 2 commands a significant premium over the 2006 Renault Clio RS 200 Cup, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity.