UK vs USA — 1962 vs 1968
| 3000 Mk III BJ8 | Corvette Stingray C3 LT-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 150 hp | 370 hp |
| Torque | 170 lb-ft | 380 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 2,912 cc | 5,733 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 9.8 sec | 5.7 sec |
| Top Speed | 121 mph | 140 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 17.1 sec | 14.0 sec |
| Wheelbase | 2,337 mm | 2,489 mm |
| Length | 4,013 mm | 4,640 mm |
| Units Produced | 17,712 | — |
| Value (Excellent) | $130,000 | $120,000 |
| Collectibility | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Rarity | 6/10 | 3/10 |
The 1968 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray C3 LT-1 emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III BJ8 counters with its unique character, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.
Putting the 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III BJ8 against the 1968 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray C3 LT-1 is a comparison that enthusiasts have debated for decades. Each car reflects distinct design philosophies shaped by different automotive cultures — UK versus USA. The 1968 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray C3 LT-1 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 370 hp compared to 150 hp, a 220-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Austin-Healey 3000 uses a Inline-6 OHV 12V displacing 2,912 cc, while the Chevrolet Corvette Stingray relies on a V8 OHV 16V with 5,733 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1968 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray C3 LT-1 edges ahead at 5.7 seconds versus 9.8 seconds. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.