USA vs USA — 1964 vs 1970
| Mustang K-Code Hi-Performance | AAR 'Cuda 340 Six Pack | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 271 hp | 290 hp |
| Torque | 314 lb-ft | 340 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 4,736 cc | 5,572 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5 sec | 5.8 sec |
| Top Speed | 130 mph | 125 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 14.8 sec | 14.0 sec |
| Weight | 2,678 lbs | 3,400 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,743 mm | 2,743 mm |
| Length | 4,613 mm | 4,871 mm |
| Units Produced | 7,273 | 2,724 |
| Original MSRP | $2,911 | $3,563 |
| Value (Excellent) | $150,000 | $180,000 |
| Collectibility | 9/10 | 9/10 |
| Rarity | 8/10 | 9/10 |
Two outstanding machines, each with compelling strengths. The 1964 Ford Mustang K-Code Hi-Performance excels in higher top speed, lighter weight, while the 1970 Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340 Six Pack stands out for quicker acceleration, greater rarity. The best advice? Drive both if you can, then follow your instincts.
Among Pony Car enthusiasts, the matchup between the 1964 Ford Mustang K-Code Hi-Performance and 1970 Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340 Six Pack is one for the ages. These Muscle era machines competed directly for buyers' attention and continue to vie for collectors' affections today. On paper, the two are remarkably close in power output, with the 1964 Ford Mustang K-Code Hi-Performance producing 271 hp and the 1970 Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340 Six Pack delivering 290 hp. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Ford Mustang uses a V8 OHV (solid lifter, high-performance) displacing 4,736 cc, while the Plymouth AAR 'Cuda relies on a V8 OHV (340 Six Pack) with 5,572 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1970 Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340 Six Pack edges ahead at 5.8 seconds versus 6.5 seconds. The Ford Mustang carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 722 lbs lighter. Whether you prioritize driving dynamics, heritage, or aesthetic appeal, both contenders make a strong case for themselves.