Japan vs Japan — 1972 vs 1992
| RX-4 | RX-7 Type R FD3S | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 110 hp | 255 hp |
| Torque | 102 lb-ft | 217 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,146 cc | 1,308 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 10.5 sec | 4.9 sec |
| Top Speed | 112 mph | 155 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 17.5 sec | 13.4 sec |
| Weight | 2,535 lbs | 2,778 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,510 mm | 2,425 mm |
| Length | 4,410 mm | 4,295 mm |
| Units Produced | 71,690 | — |
| Value (Excellent) | — | $120,000 |
| Collectibility | 5/10 | 9/10 |
| Rarity | 5/10 | 8/10 |
The 1992 Mazda RX-7 Type R FD3S emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The 1972 Mazda RX-4 counters with lighter weight, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.
The Mazda RX-4 lineage tells a fascinating story of automotive evolution. Comparing the 1972 Mazda RX-4 with the 1992 Mazda RX-7 Type R FD3S reveals how Mazda refined and reimagined one of its most important nameplates over the years. The 1992 Mazda RX-7 Type R FD3S holds a clear advantage in raw power with 255 hp compared to 110 hp, a 145-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Mazda RX-4 uses a Twin-rotor Wankel displacing 1,146 cc, while the Mazda RX-7 relies on a Rotary Twin Turbo (13B-REW) with 1,308 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1992 Mazda RX-7 Type R FD3S edges ahead at 4.9 seconds versus 10.5 seconds. The Mazda RX-4 carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 243 lbs lighter. From a collectibility standpoint, the 1992 Mazda RX-7 Type R FD3S rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.