Italy vs France — 1972 vs 1971
| Beta Monte Carlo 1.8 | A310 1600 | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 120 hp | 127 hp |
| Torque | 116 lb-ft | 112 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,756 cc | 1,605 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 8.9 sec | 7.3 sec |
| Top Speed | 118 mph | 130 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 16.5 sec | 15.5 sec |
| Weight | 2,315 lbs | 2,072 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,280 mm | 2,271 mm |
| Length | 3,985 mm | 4,180 mm |
| Units Produced | 7,798 | 2,340 |
| Original MSRP | $9,800 | $8,500 |
| Value (Excellent) | $65,000 | $75,000 |
| Collectibility | 7/10 | 8/10 |
| Rarity | 7/10 | 8/10 |
The 1971 Alpine A310 1600 emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering quicker acceleration, higher top speed, lighter weight. The 1972 Lancia Beta Monte Carlo 1.8 counters with its unique character, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.
Putting the 1972 Lancia Beta Monte Carlo 1.8 against the 1971 Alpine A310 1600 is a comparison that enthusiasts have debated for decades. Each car reflects distinct design philosophies shaped by different automotive cultures — Italy versus France. On paper, the two are remarkably close in power output, with the 1972 Lancia Beta Monte Carlo 1.8 producing 120 hp and the 1971 Alpine A310 1600 delivering 127 hp. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Lancia Beta Monte Carlo uses a Inline-4 DOHC displacing 1,756 cc, while the Alpine A310 relies on a Inline-4 OHV Renault with 1,605 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1971 Alpine A310 1600 edges ahead at 7.3 seconds versus 8.9 seconds. The Alpine A310 carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 243 lbs lighter. Whether you prioritize driving dynamics, heritage, or aesthetic appeal, both contenders make a strong case for themselves.