UK vs United Kingdom — 1963 vs 1968
| P6 3500 V8 | P6 3500 | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 144 hp | 144 hp |
| Torque | 196 lb-ft | 200 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 3,528 cc | 3,528 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 9.2 sec | 10.1 sec |
| Top Speed | 120 mph | 117 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 17.0 sec | 17.2 sec |
| Weight | 2,954 lbs | 2,976 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,641 mm | 2,629 mm |
| Length | 4,483 mm | 4,495 mm |
| Units Produced | 322,302 | 322,302 |
| Value (Excellent) | $40,000 | $35,000 |
| Collectibility | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Rarity | 4/10 | 4/10 |
On balance, the 1963 Rover P6 3500 V8 makes a stronger case on paper with quicker acceleration, higher top speed. However, the 1968 Rover P6 3500 counters with its own distinct appeal, and its appeal extends beyond mere numbers. Choose the 1963 Rover P6 3500 V8 for outright capability, or the 1968 Rover P6 3500 for a more distinctive ownership experience.
Few model names carry as much weight as the Rover P6. The 1963 and 1968 iterations represent different chapters in this storied nameplate's history, each reflecting the priorities and technologies of its era. On paper, the two are remarkably close in power output, with the 1963 Rover P6 3500 V8 producing 144 hp and the 1968 Rover P6 3500 delivering 144 hp. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Rover P6 uses a V8 OHV displacing 3,528 cc, while the Rover P6 relies on a V8 OHV (Buick-derived aluminium) with 3,528 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1963 Rover P6 3500 V8 edges ahead at 9.2 seconds versus 10.1 seconds. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.