Holden Commodore

vs

Holden Commodore VT

Australia vs Australia — 2006 vs 1997

Holden Commodore (2006)
Holden Commodore VT (1997)
Specifications
Commodore HSV GTS-R W1Commodore VT HSV GTS
Horsepower636 hp300 hp
Torque601 lb-ft339 lb-ft
Engine Size6,162 cc5,665 cc
0-60 mph3.9 sec5.5 sec
Top Speed193 mph162 mph
¼ Mile11.9 sec13.5 sec
Weight3,660 lbs
Wheelbase2,915 mm2,789 mm
Length4,936 mm4,912 mm
Units Produced300
Value (Excellent)$250,000$70,000
Collectibility5/107/10
Rarity9/106/10
The Verdict

It's a closely fought contest. The 2006 Holden Commodore HSV GTS-R W1 brings more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed to the table, and the 1997 Holden Commodore VT HSV GTS answers with stronger collectibility, better value. Both are excellent machines that reward their owners in different ways — there's no wrong answer here.

Overview

Few model names carry as much weight as the Holden Commodore. The 2006 and 1997 iterations represent different chapters in this storied nameplate's history, each reflecting the priorities and technologies of its era. The 2006 Holden Commodore HSV GTS-R W1 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 636 hp compared to 300 hp, a 336-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Holden Commodore uses a V8 Supercharged OHV 16V displacing 6,162 cc, while the Holden Commodore VT relies on a V8 OHV LS1 with 5,665 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2006 Holden Commodore HSV GTS-R W1 edges ahead at 3.9 seconds versus 5.5 seconds. On the collector market, the 2006 Holden Commodore HSV GTS-R W1 commands a significant premium over the 1997 Holden Commodore VT HSV GTS, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity. From a collectibility standpoint, the 1997 Holden Commodore VT HSV GTS rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.