Japan vs Japan — 1986 vs 1979
| Supra Turbo A MA70 | Celica Supra Mk1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 232 hp | 110 hp |
| Torque | 253 lb-ft | 136 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 2,954 cc | 2,563 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1 sec | 10.2 sec |
| Top Speed | 152 mph | 109 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 14.5 sec | 17.5 sec |
| Weight | 3,373 lbs | 2,875 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,594 mm | 2,560 mm |
| Length | 4,620 mm | 4,620 mm |
| Units Produced | — | 76,807 |
| Original MSRP | $24,100 | — |
| Value (Excellent) | $55,000 | — |
| Collectibility | 7/10 | 5/10 |
| Rarity | 5/10 | 5/10 |
The 1986 Toyota Supra Turbo A MA70 holds an edge across most measurable criteria, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. That said, the 1979 Toyota Celica Supra Mk1 brings lighter weight and remains a compelling choice for enthusiasts who value Toyota heritage. The right pick depends on whether you prioritize specifications or the intangible qualities that make a car truly special.
The 1986 Toyota Supra Turbo A MA70 and 1979 Toyota Celica Supra Mk1 share a manufacturer in Toyota, but that's where the similarities get interesting. These two models reveal the versatility and ambition of the Toyota brand. The 1986 Toyota Supra Turbo A MA70 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 232 hp compared to 110 hp, a 122-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Toyota Supra uses a Inline-6 DOHC Turbocharged displacing 2,954 cc, while the Toyota Celica Supra Mk1 relies on a Inline-6, SOHC with 2,563 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1986 Toyota Supra Turbo A MA70 edges ahead at 6.1 seconds versus 10.2 seconds. The Toyota Celica Supra Mk1 carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 498 lbs lighter. From a collectibility standpoint, the 1986 Toyota Supra Turbo A MA70 rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.