UK vs UK — 1963 vs 1959
| Herald 1200 Convertible | Herald 13/60 Convertible | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 39 hp | 61 hp |
| Torque | 55 lb-ft | 74 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,147 cc | 1,296 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 22.2 sec | 17.0 sec |
| Top Speed | 78 mph | 85 mph |
| ¼ Mile | — | 21.0 sec |
| Weight | 1,848 lbs | 1,848 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,311 mm | 2,311 mm |
| Length | 3,886 mm | 3,886 mm |
| Units Produced | 523,000 | 232,000 |
| Original MSRP | $1,699 | $1,900 |
| Value (Excellent) | $20,000 | $20,000 |
| Collectibility | 5/10 | 4/10 |
| Rarity | 3/10 | 4/10 |
The 1959 Triumph Herald 13/60 Convertible emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The 1963 Triumph Herald 1200 Convertible counters with stronger collectibility, better value, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.
Tracing the evolution of the Triumph Herald from 1963 to 1959 offers a compelling look at how automotive design and engineering progressed. These two variants showcase the changing face of Triumph. The 1959 Triumph Herald 13/60 Convertible holds a clear advantage in raw power with 61 hp compared to 39 hp, a 22-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1959 Triumph Herald 13/60 Convertible edges ahead at 17.0 seconds versus 22.2 seconds. Whether you prioritize driving dynamics, heritage, or aesthetic appeal, both contenders make a strong case for themselves.