France vs France — 1994 vs 1965
| Clio Williams | 16 TS | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 150 hp | 83 hp |
| Torque | 129 lb-ft | 94 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,998 cc | 1,565 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5 sec | 13.5 sec |
| Top Speed | 134 mph | 103 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 15.5 sec | 19.5 sec |
| Weight | — | 2,293 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,472 mm | 2,650 mm |
| Length | 3,710 mm | 4,260 mm |
| Units Produced | 12,100 | 1,845,959 |
| Value (Excellent) | $45,000 | $22,000 |
| Collectibility | 5/10 | 6/10 |
| Rarity | 7/10 | 6/10 |
On balance, the 1994 Renault Clio Williams makes a stronger case on paper with more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. However, the 1965 Renault 16 TS counters with stronger collectibility, better value, and its appeal extends beyond mere numbers. Choose the 1994 Renault Clio Williams for outright capability, or the 1965 Renault 16 TS for a more distinctive ownership experience.
Renault has long offered a diverse lineup, and comparing the 1994 Renault Clio Williams with the 1965 Renault 16 TS highlights the breadth of the marque's engineering philosophy. The 1994 Renault Clio Williams holds a clear advantage in raw power with 150 hp compared to 83 hp, a 67-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Renault Clio Williams uses a Inline-4 DOHC 16V displacing 1,998 cc, while the Renault 16 relies on a Inline-4 OHV with 1,565 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1994 Renault Clio Williams edges ahead at 7.5 seconds versus 13.5 seconds. Rarity plays a significant role here — with only 12,100 units built, the 1994 Renault Clio Williams is considerably scarcer than the Renault 16's 1,845,959 examples. On the collector market, the 1994 Renault Clio Williams commands a significant premium over the 1965 Renault 16 TS, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity.