Italy vs Sweden — 2002 vs 2004
| Enzo V12 | CCR Standard | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 660 hp | 806 hp |
| Torque | 485 lb-ft | 678 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 5,998 cc | 4,700 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 3.3 sec | 3.2 sec |
| Top Speed | 221 mph | 245 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 11.0 sec | 9.5 sec |
| Weight | 3,009 lbs | 2,601 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,650 mm | 2,660 mm |
| Length | 4,702 mm | 4,190 mm |
| Units Produced | 400 | 14 |
| Original MSRP | $659,330 | $650,000 |
| Value (Excellent) | $5,000,000 | $3,000,000 |
| Collectibility | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Rarity | 9/10 | 10/10 |
Numbers favor the 2004 Koenigsegg CCR Standard with more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The 2002 Ferrari Enzo V12 offers its unique character, and has its own devoted following. For those who let their heart decide, either car delivers a rewarding ownership experience.
The rivalry between Italy and Sweden automotive industries has produced legendary matchups, and the 2002 Ferrari Enzo V12 versus 2004 Koenigsegg CCR Standard is among the most fascinating. These two cars represent the best of their national engineering schools. The 2004 Koenigsegg CCR Standard holds a clear advantage in raw power with 806 hp compared to 660 hp, a 146-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Ferrari Enzo uses a V12 DOHC 48V (Tipo F140B) displacing 5,998 cc, while the Koenigsegg CCR relies on a V8 DOHC 32V Supercharged with 4,700 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2004 Koenigsegg CCR Standard edges ahead at 3.2 seconds versus 3.3 seconds. The Koenigsegg CCR carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 408 lbs lighter. Rarity plays a significant role here — with only 14 units built, the 2004 Koenigsegg CCR Standard is considerably scarcer than the Ferrari Enzo's 400 examples.