Sweden vs Sweden — 1981 vs 2002
| 242 Turbo Group A Homologation | XC90 V8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 155 hp | 311 hp |
| Torque | 181 lb-ft | 325 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 2,127 cc | 4,414 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 8.9 sec | 6.4 sec |
| Top Speed | 124 mph | 130 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 16.7 sec | 14.8 sec |
| Weight | 2,932 lbs | 4,734 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,640 mm | 2,857 mm |
| Length | 4,790 mm | 4,807 mm |
| Original MSRP | $16,495 | $48,900 |
| Value (Excellent) | $40,000 | $18,000 |
| Collectibility | 7/10 | 3/10 |
| Rarity | 7/10 | 4/10 |
The 2002 Volvo XC90 V8 emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The 1981 Volvo 242 Turbo Group A Homologation counters with lighter weight, stronger collectibility, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.
Within the Volvo stable, the 1981 Volvo 242 Turbo Group A Homologation and 2002 Volvo XC90 V8 represent different approaches to performance and purpose. Both carry the Volvo badge, yet each carves out its own distinct identity. The 2002 Volvo XC90 V8 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 311 hp compared to 155 hp, a 156-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Volvo 242 Turbo uses a Inline-4 Turbo SOHC displacing 2,127 cc, while the Volvo XC90 relies on a V8 DOHC 32V with 4,414 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2002 Volvo XC90 V8 edges ahead at 6.4 seconds versus 8.9 seconds. The Volvo 242 Turbo carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 1802 lbs lighter. On the collector market, the 1981 Volvo 242 Turbo Group A Homologation commands a significant premium over the 2002 Volvo XC90 V8, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity. From a collectibility standpoint, the 1981 Volvo 242 Turbo Group A Homologation rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.